|
|
Post by ChemicalTrain on Apr 9, 2006 2:41:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The HangMan on Apr 9, 2006 5:20:37 GMT -5
The Real Leatherface , Norman Bates An Buffelo Bill
|
|
|
|
Post by The HangMan on Apr 9, 2006 5:21:54 GMT -5
i feel sorry for this bloke tho his mother made him like that he was a very ill person well in the head any way
|
|
|
|
Post by ChemicalTrain on Apr 9, 2006 15:06:28 GMT -5
i feel sorry for this bloke tho his mother made him like that he was a very ill person well in the head any way  |
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Apr 9, 2006 22:35:34 GMT -5
Yea really.
|
|
|
|
Post by hotnoodletuna on Apr 10, 2006 16:28:01 GMT -5
Ol Ed didn't really kill that many people. He was mostly a necrophiliac and grave robber. Very sickk dude, though, to be sure
|
|
|
|
Post by ChemicalTrain on Apr 10, 2006 19:17:40 GMT -5
Yeah. I think what he did with the remains of his few victims and the remains of the people he dug up is what made him so infamous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Apr 10, 2006 22:55:50 GMT -5
Exactly. Necrophilia......the stuff legends are made of. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by leatherface on Jul 6, 2006 10:46:37 GMT -5
the police and investigators areent entirely sure if ed killed more they do belive he did and he burned the bodies he may have killed his brother in 1945 he may have lite a forest taht his brother was in on fire so he could have his mom all to his self annd they belive ed killed his neighbor a private investagator and possibly a few detective sthat went missing around the time there not sure if ed killed them though thats why hes te king of phsycopaths Edward Gein (1906-1984) ghe died of cancer i belive
|
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 6, 2006 11:05:15 GMT -5
Without him, there would be no Psycho or Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
|
|
|
|
Post by leatherface on Jul 6, 2006 12:38:13 GMT -5
exactly
|
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 6, 2006 15:10:08 GMT -5
What did you make of TCM 2?
I thought it was more comical than serious, but I liked the lighthearted tone to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by leatherface on Jul 6, 2006 18:45:37 GMT -5
well i thought it was decent i didnt like the thing with scary movies and comedy put together tahst why i hate the scary movie seris but my line under my avatar is the tag line for leatherafce:texas chainsaw massacre 3 the saw is family
|
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 6, 2006 18:58:57 GMT -5
I have only seen 1 and 2.
Is the remake any good?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Jul 6, 2006 21:38:43 GMT -5
I love part 1. I love part 2 even though it is more comical. Bill Mosely just gives an awsome performance as Chop-Top. Part 3 was good, but not as good as part 1 or 2. Part 4 totally sucks balls and should be burned. The remake sucks because it shows no creativity and the producers should be killed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 7, 2006 8:54:08 GMT -5
The new TCM movie looks a lot like the remake, judging by the trailer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Jul 7, 2006 13:06:52 GMT -5
Yea. I'll see it though. oh...I just bought a pair of Ed Gein buttons. lol. Got them for $3.00 of ebay. Gonna put them on my back pack for school next year. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by leatherface on Jul 7, 2006 14:31:41 GMT -5
the remake is awesome
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Jul 14, 2006 20:21:22 GMT -5
The remake is crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by leatherface on Jul 14, 2006 22:01:57 GMT -5
aww come one it buried the original its everything the original was ment to be! man
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Jul 14, 2006 23:43:15 GMT -5
What are you talking about. TCM is one of the greatest films. It took on a powerful effect with its realism and gritty in your face documentary style. TCM is how horror films are supposed to be made. The remake is exactly the opposite. It has slicked up cinematography which completely loses the documentary aspect of the original, and it is filled with teen WB stars. You cannot honestly say that is better, can you? TCM 2004 is shameless peice of celluloid made with no creativity and only came to the screen because MTV brainwashed kids would give up their money for a peice of crap like it. The original is far superior in every way. It transcened the sub-genres of horror and created one of the best films in the history of horror.
|
|
|
|
Post by The HangMan on Jul 19, 2006 5:21:31 GMT -5
you two boy beter play nice  i think you are both wrong LeatherFace the remake is not as good as you are makeing it out to be an the face that you see leatherface's face is just GAY an pissed me off but Lust del Carrion i realy dont think its fer to call it totel CRAP the first one is the best then number 3 then the remake then number 2 an number 4 is the worst ever so when you put the remake next to number 4 the remake is infacet the best film ever lol |
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 19, 2006 6:09:02 GMT -5
Don't piss Hangman off.
He will fly over to where you live and do a dirty dance for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lust del Carrion on Jul 20, 2006 20:50:05 GMT -5
No. It goes. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (remake), and finally The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 4.
|
|
